NEWS
The story behind Zimbabwe’s scarf
Published
24 Jul 2018on

An accidental fashion accessory is helping President Emmerson Munangagwa rebrand the country – and distance himself from his predecessor Robert Mugabe and his 37-year rule.
Since the Davos summit in January, Emmerson Munangagwa is hardly ever seen without a scarf in the colours of Zimbabwe’s flag around his neck – no matter the temperature.
It was perfect for the freezing Swiss mountain village in mid-winter – and the Mr Emmerson Munangagwa proudly wore it during a BBC interview, later tweeting a clip of it saying, “Zimbabwe is open for business.”
But the scarf now has a life of its own, beyond the World Economic Forum – and even has its own hashtag #EDscarf.
Mr Emmerson Munangagwa, popularly known by his initials ED, got his hands on the scarf by chance when a mother-and-daughter fashion start-up contacted the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on a Saturday before the Zimbabwe delegation left for Davos.
‘Such a shock’
There had been much hype ahead of the summit with Zimbabwe’s new leader anxious to attract urgent investment to revive an economy that has been on its knees for the last decade.
“We called and were like, ‘We’ve got these products, we’re not sure how you can use them.’ And the next thing you know the president is wearing the scarf… It was really such a shock on our end,” Celia Rukato told the BBC’s Newsday programme.
She said it was one of the first products she and her mother, Hesphina Rukato, produced when they formed their company in 2014 – and it was sold, with little fanfare, at a curio shop at Zimbabwe’s Harare International Airport.
It was a way for Zimbabweans to show they were “proud to be Zimbabwean”
Pride in the scarf chimes with the #ThisFlag social media movement of 2016 that protested against Mr Mugabe’s rule and the dire economic situation.
It was launched by a pastor angered by the state of the nation. He posted a video on Facebook of himself wrapped in the Zimbabwean flag, explaining why the colours were significant.
“They tell me that the green is for the vegetation and for the crops. I don’t see any crops in my country,” Evan Mawarire said.
“The yellow is for all the minerals – diamonds, platinum, chrome – I don’t know how much of it is left; I don’t know who they sold it to and how much they got for it.
“The red they say that is the blood that was shed to secure freedom for me and I’m so thankful for that – I just don’t know that if they were here, they that shed their blood, and saw the way this country is that they would demand their blood be brought back.”
Before Mr Mugabe was ousted, vendors were even banned from selling flags without authorisation.
But during the unprecedented protest days before Mr Mugabe’s resignation, the flag was everywhere – around the necks of many Zimbabweans, no matter their political party.
‘National dress’
Following the scarf’s outing at Davos, it has become a must – near enough a uniform with slightly different designs – for those representing the country abroad.
For the Rukatos the success of the scarf feeds into their ambition to start a debate about creating a national dress for Zimbabwe.
“One of the things we’ve noticed over the years is that most nationalities have a national dress and Zimbabweans have not had anything.
So the scarf is just one of the things we’re beginning to put out there,” Hesphina Rukato told journalist Hopewell Chin’ono.
Creating a national dress is now a manifesto promise for the main opposition Movement Democratic Change Alliance, whose leader Nelson Chamisa is Mr Emmerson Munangagwa’s main rival in presidential elections later this month.
For the scarf, things have also got a little more political because of the president’s passion for it. At nearly every campaign rally for the ruling Zanu-PF party – whether or not it is cold – he is seen with it around his neck.
It has even got the head of the electoral commission into trouble, when a photo of her posing in the scarf with its creator, Celia Rukato, next to her began circulating on social media.
Priscilla Chigumba said the photo was taken before she was appointed in January to head the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission (Zec).
“That scarf was designed by a brilliant young Zimbabwean girl who then approached a group of us when I was a high court judge to say, ‘Look I’ve designed this scarf in an effort to build national consciousness.’
And I did want to support her, and I was very grateful for the present that she gave me and I took a picture,” she told Zimbabwe’s Capitalk FM earlier this month.
It didn’t help that one of the Zec chair’s aides said last month it was must have been faked – not realising it was an old photo.
“He obviously thought in his mind it must be a Photoshop as he knew I’d never jeopardise the image of the commission,” Ms Chigumba said.
Despite the controversy, the scarf remains popular – and a bestseller for the Rukatos.
One young man returning to university in neighbouring South Africa last week wanted to buy one of the last ones for sale that day for $24 (£18) at Harare’s International Airport.
“Of course I wouldn’t wear it in Harare at home – but it looks cool in Port Elizabeth,” he said.
BBC
You may like

Examining the Consequences: President Mnangagwa’s Approval of the Patriotic Bill Amplifies Fears of Repressive Measures

Zimbabwe runs out of passports, adding to a long list of shortages

Zimbabwe Bans All Foreign Currency Effective 24 June 2019

General Electric Wins Bid to Build $4 Billion Zambia-Zimbabwe Hydro Plant

Apostle Talent Chiwenga in accident

President Mnangagwa promises new currency
HEALTH
Constitutional Court sets aside High Court ruling that would have widened Zimbabwe’s abortion grounds
The Constitutional Court has declined to confirm a High Court ruling on mental health and abortion, saying the lower court skipped a required step. It did not rule the restrictions justified.
Published
22 Oct 2026on
22/10/2026Zimbabwe’s Constitutional Court has set aside a High Court judgment that sought to widen access to lawful abortion, ruling that the lower court did not complete the legal analysis required before striking down a law.
In a judgment delivered on 14 October 2026, the apex court declined to confirm the High Court’s declarations that provisions of the Termination of Pregnancy Act were unconstitutional, according to reports by NewZimbabwe.com and The Herald. The High Court had found the law unconstitutional to the extent that it excluded mental health as a ground for lawful termination, and that its definition of “unlawful intercourse” did not cover conduct prohibited under the Mental Health Act.
Writing for the court, Justice Bharat Patel said the High Court had not separately applied the test in section 86(2) of the Constitution, which asks whether a limitation on rights is fair, reasonable, necessary and justifiable in an open, just and democratic society. “A finding that the impugned legislation limits a constitutional right does not, without more, render that legislation unconstitutional,” he said.
The case was brought by the Community Working Group on Health and legislator and activist Nyasha Batitsa against the Health and Justice ministers, the Attorney-General and Parliament. The applicants argued that physical and mental health cannot be separated, and warned that forcing women with severe psychiatric conditions to continue a pregnancy could expose them to suicide, postpartum psychosis and lasting psychological harm.
The government defended the law, arguing that it is already broad enough to cover health conditions that threaten a woman’s life, and cautioning against a blanket approach to mental health conditions, which vary in severity. Pro-life groups that took part as friends of the court said expanding the grounds was a matter for Parliament.
The court also rejected any suggestion that Parliament’s decisions are beyond judicial review. “The conduct and decisions of Parliament, like any other exercise of public power, are subject to constitutional review by this Court,” Justice Patel said.
Importantly, the ruling is not a finding that excluding mental health from the abortion grounds is constitutionally justified. Both outlets report that the court’s decision turned on how the High Court reached its conclusion, leaving the broader question of whether mental health should be a lawful ground unresolved in these proceedings. The Act dates back to the 1970s.
Sources: NewZimbabwe.com, The Herald.
BUSINESS
Government to revoke licences of non-compliant foreign firms in reserved sectors
Cabinet says foreign-owned businesses in 17 sectors reserved for Zimbabweans face licence suspension or revocation after inspections of more than 3,000 companies.
Published
21 Oct 2026on
21/10/2026Foreign-owned businesses operating in sectors reserved for Zimbabweans face having their licences suspended or revoked, the government said after Tuesday’s Cabinet meeting, as it moves from awareness campaigns to enforcement.
According to both The Herald and NewZimbabwe.com, inspections covered more than 3,000 companies across all 10 provinces. Cabinet was told that most foreign operators had not regularised their status despite campaigns and formal non-compliance notices. The Ministry of Industry and Commerce, the briefing said, will suspend or revoke the operating licences of non-compliant businesses in reserved sectors.
The rules come from Statutory Instrument 215 of 2025, gazetted in December 2025, which reserves 17 sectors for Zimbabwean citizens. Thirteen are reserved exclusively for locals, including borehole drilling, clearing and customs, tobacco grading, estate agencies and artisanal mining. In four others, retail and wholesale, haulage and logistics, grain milling, and shipping and forwarding, foreign firms may take part only through exemptions or regularisation plans. Retail and brick moulding were cited as areas where foreign players still have a large presence.
Both outlets reported the same compliance figures: 693 formal applications received; 269 foreign operators applying to regularise by transferring 75 percent of equity to Zimbabwean citizens; 144 entities seeking confirmation of their local status; and 63 entities qualifying for statutory exemption by meeting investment thresholds or being recognised international brands. The reports do not explain how these categories relate to the 693 total.
The reports differ on who spoke at the briefing. NewZimbabwe names Information Minister Soda Zhemu, while The Herald names Acting Information Minister Prof Paul Mavima and credits Industry and Commerce Minister Mangaliso Ndlovu with the compliance update. Neither says how many licences have so far been withdrawn, what penalties will apply, or when enforcement begins.
Sources: The Herald (via Zimbabwe Situation); NewZimbabwe.com.
BUSINESS
ZINARA clears US$206 million DBSA loan for highway rebuild
The Zimbabwe National Road Administration says it has fully repaid the 2011 Development Bank of Southern Africa loan used to rebuild the Plumtree–Bulawayo–Harare–Mutare highway.
Published
21 Oct 2026on
21/10/2026The Zimbabwe National Road Administration (ZINARA) says it has fully repaid a US$206 million loan from the Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA), closing a debt that has weighed on the roads authority for years.
Board chairperson George Manyaya announced the repayment at ZINARA’s 10th annual general meeting in Harare. According to both The Herald and NewZimbabwe.com, the final payment was made on 30 September. “We no longer owe DBSA; we finished paying,” NewZimbabwe quoted him as saying.
The loan was secured in 2011 to fund the rehabilitation and upgrading of the Plumtree–Bulawayo–Harare–Mutare highway, one of the country’s main trade corridors. The two outlets give slightly different lengths for the road, so this report does not quote a figure.
The debt had repeatedly drawn scrutiny from Parliament. NewZimbabwe reported that Manyaya said the Public Accounts Committee had questioned ZINARA several times over the unpaid loan, and that clearing it was a priority for the current board because it stood in the way of raising further funding. The Herald reported that the repayment was presented as evidence that Zimbabwe honours its sovereign obligations and should help rebuild its credibility with lenders and unlock funding for infrastructure.
ZINARA collects road-user revenue, including licence and toll fees, and channels it to the maintenance and rebuilding of roads. With the DBSA obligation settled, the agency is expected to have more room to finance road works and to approach financiers, although neither report sets out specific new funding arrangements agreed on the strength of the repayment.
For motorists and transporters, the practical test will be whether the money once used to service the debt now translates into visible repairs on the country’s busiest routes.
Sources: The Herald (via Zimbabwe Situation); NewZimbabwe.com.
Zanu-PF conference backs Mnangagwa as sole candidate and pushes congress to 2029
Nearly 200,000 Zimbabweans have returned from South Africa, Cabinet told
Constitutional Court sets aside High Court ruling that would have widened Zimbabwe’s abortion grounds
Trending
NEWS30 Oct 2023Zimbabwe Care Workers Fleeced Thousands of Pounds in COS Visa Scandal
POLITICS30 Oct 2023Mnangagwa appoints army General Sibanda into the Zanu PF politburo
HOW TO COOK IT2 Apr 2025How To Cook It And Live
LONDON THEATRE14 Jul 2026London Musicals 2026| London Theatre Shows
SPORTS30 Jul 2026FC Platinum turn to Thabo Senong after parting ways with Joel Luphahla
CRIME24 Jul 2026Holy Ten granted US$500 bail over alleged rape of 14-year-old
- NEWS4 Aug 2026
ZIMSEC releases June 2026 results as O-Level pass rate falls and A-Level improves
NEWS30 Jul 2026ZIFA mourns Wieslaw Grabowski, the Pole who spent 40 years finding Zimbabwe’s footballers
ENTERTAINMENT15 Jul 2026Thomas Mapfumo accepts Wicknell Chivayo’s US$1 million offer for two concerts
SPORTS15 Jul 2026Tembo’s Warriors: a fresh start, and a group that spares no one






















