Connect with us

INTERNATIONAL

The Independent Group: Who are they and what do they stand for?

Published

on

The Independent Group UK

The Independent Group, from Labour, Chuka Umunna, Luciana Berger, Mike Gapes, Chris Leslie, Angela Smith, Ann Coffey, Gavin Shuker, and Joan Ryan have all left.

It wasn’t long before Conservative MPs Anna Soubry, Heidi Allen and Sarah Wollaston followed.

Here we answer some of your biggest questions about what is now the fourth-largest group in Parliament.

Are there going to be by-elections?

Jeremy Corbyn has said the Labour MPs who have quit the party should “resign and put themselves up for election”.

In a video posted on Twitter, the Labour leader said it was the “decent and democratic thing to do” because the MPs wanted to “abandon the policies on which they were elected”.

If an MP changes or leaves the party they were elected under, there does not automatically have to be a by-election.

This is because at the ballot box voters chose the individual they wanted as their MP, not the party they wanted running the country.

However, the defectors could trigger a by-election by resigning as MPs.

They could then immediately stand for election in the same constituency – that’s what Conservative Zac Goldsmith did in 2016. (He lost his 23,015 majority and was ousted).

But these MPs don’t want to face a by-election right now.

Voters can also call for a petition to recall their MP – and trigger a by-election.

But this can only happen under specific circumstances, such as an MP being convicted of an offence and receiving a custodial sentence. And none of these conditions apply to the members of the Independent Group.

As it stands, if they were to run in a by-election (or any general election) the name the Independent Group wouldn’t appear on the ballot paper because they’re not registered as a political party.

Who funds them?

On their website, the group of MPs say they are “supported” by a company called Gemini A Ltd, which was set up last month by Labour defector Mr Shuker.

Since they launched, they have been crowd-funding via their website.

But because they are not a registered political party, they don’t have to play by the rules of the Electoral Commission and disclose their financial backers.

However, they say they intend to do so anyway and will publish all donations over £7,500 alongside donors’ names.

If the group registers with the commission, the MPs would be entitled to “short money” – that is funding given to opposition parties in Parliament to support them in their parliamentary business, expenses and costs of running.

Which one is the leader?

Because it is not a political party – yet – the Independent Group does not have to have a leader.

But it is thought they will choose one at some point.

Chuka Umunna – who briefly stood to be the leader of the Labour Party and is seen as the driving force behind the Labour MPs – is most often touted as a potential leader.

Anna Soubry, who has a high media profile, might also be seen as a candidate.

But, sources say, they are still trying to recruit new members so it would not be a good idea to select a leader at this stage.

The group is due to meet next week to work out who will speak for them at Parliamentary occasions, such as responding to the Chancellor’s Spring Statement, and who will take on the job of whip, to organise their voting in Parliament.

What do they stand for?

The group has not published a manifesto – but it does have a list of 11 “values”, which it claims the main political parties have forgotten.

Top of the list is the belief that Britain is a “great country of which people are rightly proud” – and the government must do “whatever it takes” to protect national security.

Notably, there is no sign of Brexit on the list, although it mentions “maintaining strong alliances with our closest European and international allies on trade, regulation, defence, security and counter-terrorism”.

On inequality, the group calls for the “barriers of poverty, prejudice and discrimination” to be removed – and says everybody should make a contribution to society.

It also says it believes that:

“Paid work should be secure and pay should be fair”

“We have a responsibility to future generations to protect our environment”

Britain “works best as a diverse, mixed social market economy” with “well-regulated private enterprise”

“The collective provision of public services and the NHS can be delivered through government action”

“Our free media, the rule of law, and our open, tolerant and respectful democratic society should be cherished and renewed”

It remains to be seen which policies the Independent Group would adopt to enact their values.

What are the potential tensions?

The Independent Group have bonded over their shared desire to prevent a no-deal Brexit.

Some of them have been working together for months as members of the cross-party People’s Vote campaign for another EU referendum.

Former Conservative Heidi Allen said they had been “clinging to each other like on a shipwreck” during the “chaos” of Brexit, and had begun to realise they had “quite a lot in common” with each other.

They do come from different sides of the traditional political divide – and there may be tensions over issues such as austerity and the privatisation of public services.

Last year, Luciana Berger, then a Labour MP, blamed austerity for having a “devastating cumulative impact” on her constituents and Chuka Umunna has said austerity “failed” and “disproportionately hit the poorest”.

Anna Soubry – a minister in the Conservative/Lib Dem coalition government – has defended then Chancellor George Osborne’s public spending cuts and welfare freeze.

But Heidi Allen has been highly critical of welfare cuts too, and Universal Credit in particular.

Asked on BBC Newsnight if they could all agree on issues such as this, Ms Allen said “probably not, but it doesn’t matter because this is a fresh start”.

All 11 have signed up to the broad principles in their founding statement – and share a socially liberal outlook and a belief in a “mixed economy” with free markets and publicly-owned services.

How powerful will they be in Parliament?

With 11 members, they are the fourth largest group of MPs – behind the Conservatives, Labour and the SNP, and equal to the Lib Dems.

They are bigger than Plaid Cymru and the DUP – the party on whom Theresa May depends to pass legislation.

As the BBC’s political editor Laura Kuenssberg explains: “When a government has no majority on its own, even shy of a dozen MPs can wield political strength.

“The defections change not just the official arithmetic in Parliament, but its alchemy and atmosphere.”
If they were to surpass the SNP’s Westminster cohort – which would require 24 more MPs – the party would become Parliament’s third largest.

That would then entitle them to various privileges, including getting a guaranteed two questions at Prime Minister’s Questions.

How will it impact Brexit?

In terms of the parliamentary votes, it won’t. These MPs were defying their former party whips on Brexit long before they quit.

But if enough Tories leave, Mrs May’s slim majority will be wiped out, throwing her plans to get a tweaked version of her Brexit deal through Parliament into even more doubt.
BBC

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

INTERNATIONAL

New UK ambassador Gill Lever presents credentials to Mnangagwa

Britain’s new ambassador to Zimbabwe says trade and investment, and opportunities for women and girls, are her priorities after meeting President Mnangagwa.

Published

on

Britain’s new ambassador to Zimbabwe, Gill Lever, presented her credentials to President Emmerson Mnangagwa on Thursday 15 October and set out the priorities she plans to pursue in Harare, according to reports by The Herald and New Zimbabwe.

Speaking after the meeting, Lever described the relationship between the two countries as a “modern respectful partnership”. She said she and the president had discussed bilateral relations, and that her priorities are trade and investment, opportunities for women and girls, and stronger people-to-people links between Britain and Zimbabwe.

Both outlets report that she pointed to a US$50 million financing deal announced last month through British International Investment, aimed at supporting farmers and entrepreneurs in Zimbabwe. The Herald reports that she also referred to investments intended to help address the country’s energy needs.

She also stressed stronger people-to-people links between the two countries. The reports do not say what specific measures that might involve, and neither carries a response from the Zimbabwean government beyond the meeting itself.

Her remarks, as quoted by both outlets, struck a cooperative tone focused on economic ties. The two reports spell her given names slightly differently, so this article uses the shorter form, Gill Lever.

Sources: The Herald, New Zimbabwe.

Continue Reading

DIASPORA

Zimbabwean lawyer Brian Kagoro blocked from Nairobi flight despite Kenyan court order

Brian Kagoro was pulled off an Addis Ababa flight to Nairobi and stopped from reboarding, months after a Kenyan court barred further arbitrary denial of his entry. Civil society groups are demanding answers.

Published

on

Zimbabwean constitutional lawyer Brian Kagoro was removed from a Nairobi-bound flight in Addis Ababa on Tuesday and prevented from reboarding, despite a Kenyan High Court order protecting his right to enter the country.

The Pan African Lawyers Union said Kagoro, 51, had boarded the flight when security personnel took him off the aircraft and questioned him. He was then barred from reboarding, making it impossible to complete the journey.

“The circumstances under which he was removed from the aircraft, questioned and prevented from continuing his journey are deeply concerning, particularly given the existing court order directing that he be granted entry into Kenya,” PALU said. It added that his legal team was seeking urgent clarification from the authorities and taking steps to enforce the order.

Kagoro, who is Africa Director at the Open Society Foundations and a co-founder of the Crisis in Zimbabwe Coalition, was detained for more than ten hours at Jomo Kenyatta International Airport on 22 February this year, declared persona non grata and flown back to Johannesburg. Kenyan officials accused him of involvement in a foreign-funded network seeking to coordinate anti-government protests. He denied the allegations, saying he had travelled for a family event and a speaking engagement.

PALU, the East Africa Law Society, the Law Society of Kenya and the Kenyan Section of the International Commission of Jurists filed a constitutional petition challenging the deportation on due process and rule-of-law grounds. In June the Constitutional and Human Rights Division of the High Court issued conservatory orders protecting Kagoro against further arbitrary denial of entry, pending determination of that petition. Tuesday’s trip was made under that order.

Kenyan civil society organisations had planned to receive him at the airport in a public show of solidarity, with a press briefing to follow. Both were cancelled.

More than 20 civil society organisations, professional associations and business figures have since demanded that the government comply with the order and account publicly for what happened, including whether Kenyan officials asked for or caused his removal in Addis Ababa.

“A court order binds every public officer and state agency. Immigration or national security powers cannot lawfully be used, directly or indirectly, to defeat it,” their statement said. They noted the incident fell on the International Day of Democracy.

Sources: Nairobi News; The Eastleigh Voice; Nehanda Radio; Kenyans.co.ke; statement by the Pan African Lawyers Union.

Continue Reading

INTERNATIONAL

Netherlands to close its Harare embassy in diplomatic network shake-up

The Dutch government will shut its Harare mission as part of a global restructuring, weeks after Sweden closed its own embassy in Zimbabwe. Dutch interests in Zimbabwe, Zambia and Malawi will be handled from elsewhere.

Published

on

The Netherlands is to close its embassy in Harare as part of a wider restructuring of its diplomatic network, the Dutch government has announced, in a decision that will also affect its work in Zambia and Malawi.

The closure was set out in a letter from Dutch Foreign Affairs Minister Tom Berendsen to the Netherlands House of Representatives, outlining plans to realign the country’s overseas mission network in response to what the government described as changing global dynamics.

“Our embassies are crucial in order to effectively promote the interests of our Kingdom. They are the eyes, ears and voice of the Netherlands abroad,” Berendsen said. “It is important for us to continually adapt the mission network with a view to geopolitical developments, and to make careful decisions on how and where Dutch interests will best be served.”

In a statement, the Netherlands Embassy in Zimbabwe acknowledged the decision would be significant news for partners and friends in Zimbabwe, Zambia and Malawi, given the relationships built up over the years.

“The decision is part of a broader restructuring of the Netherlands’ diplomatic network and does not change our appreciation for the close ties or our commitment to working with the respective governments and other partners across the region,” the embassy said, adding that it was focused on “ensuring a careful transition towards closure”.

The Dutch government also confirmed it would shut missions in Tripoli, Bujumbura and Yangon, along with its consulate-general in Rio de Janeiro. Dutch interests in the affected countries will in future be handled from embassies in neighbouring states. The government said it would explore opening embassies in Podgorica and Windhoek, working with Belgium and Luxembourg.

The announcement lands weeks after Sweden closed its own Harare embassy. The Swedish government confirmed that 31 August was the last day its Harare office was open to visitors, as it phased out bilateral development cooperation with Zimbabwe after decades of direct engagement, while saying diplomatic relations would continue with a sharper focus on trade and investment.

Sources: NewZimbabwe.com; NewsDay Zimbabwe; The Zimbabwean; Sweden Abroad (Embassy of Sweden, Harare).

Continue Reading

Trending